Earlier this month, Jon Bon Jovi accused Steve Jobs of killing the music industry [1]. (I would link to the original source but it’s behind the Times paywall, so I’ll save you the hassle). The same day, I came across this article on PaidContent.org, a website covering “the economics of digital content”.
It looks at the proposed review of copyright law in the UK, and some of the key vested interests involved. Representatives of the music industry in particular, such as Fergal Sharkey, are attacking the government’s fledgling plans for copyright reform – and not because they’re afraid of “piracy” but because they are afraid of Google and the technology industry in general.
Read more at ORGZine.
Category Archives: Digital Rights
[Elsewhere] Free your gadgets
I would be willing to bet you a not-insubstantial amount of money that Steve Jobs would love to be able to say that the iPhone was the first mobile phone to control a space craft. But it’s not going to be. Instead, British scientists are planning to put an Android phone – exact model to be confirmed – in space.
Read more at ORGZine.
[Elsewhere] The future of TV has just arrived
Netflix, the US TV and movie streaming service has been in the news rather a lot recently. It seems Hollywood can’t quite figure out whether it should be embracing or trying to kill the company.
As Greg Sandoval points out, Netflix is posing significant commercial challenges to Hollywood’s current business models and distribution channels. It competes – with astounding success – with channels as diverse as DVD sales, movie sales to airlines, and cable and broadcast television.
Read more at ORGZine.
[Elsewhere] Who owns your Twitter username?
When you signed up to Twitter, did you read the small print? Or did you just scroll past the 10-line box of monospaced font Twitter gives you to view their Terms of Service (which are actually six-and-a-half pages long, excluding the “Twitter Rules” which are also part of the ToS), and click “Create Account”? If you’re anything like me, you probably did the latter, and thus missed the following crucial point:
Read more at ORGZine.
[Elsewhere] Maker Faire 2011
Maker Faire UK is a two-day celebration of creativity, sharing and the pure joy of making things, which took over Newcastle’s two main science venues, the Centre for Life and the Discovery Museum, over the weekend of March 12th and 13th. It’s an event with a long tradition in the US, and this year saw its third UK incarnation.
Read more at ORGZine.
[Elsewhere] Online community shames minister out of office
Much has been talked recently about what (if any) impact Twitter has on revolutions, and what Wikileaks will do for Western democracy. Mr. Morozov’s glum assessment aside, technology is having a massive impact on the relationship between the state and the individual in many areas – sometimes to the advantage of the state and sometimes otherwise.
Read more at ORGZine.
[Elsewhere] Copyright gone mad
Earlier this week, BoingBoing covered the story of Zazzle – an online merchandise company – taking down a badge which read “While you were reading Tolkien I was watching Evangelion”. The original story alleged that this was prompted by the Tolkien Estate claiming copyright infringement, though subsequently it has emerged that it was actually Zazzle acting on their own initiative who caused the withdrawal of the product.
Read more at ORGZine.
[Elsewhere] Selling the Internet
One of the three things I learned from my economics & politics degree (I’ll tell you the other two some other time) is neatly summarised by the following stat: out of said three-year degree, we spent one week learning how the free market worked, and the remaining time learning about all the ways in which it doesn’t.
Read more at ORGZine.
Writing for ORGZine – a trip down memory lane
I’ve been writing for ORGZine for about three months now, and I can’t shake a certain feeling of deja-vu. I used to be, if not active then certainly extremely interested, in a few areas of Digital Rights back in the late 90s and early 2000s. My particular geekdoms were largely centred around the Open Source space and the music downloads space (Remember Napster?). I then graduated from University, got a real job in IT and promptly became much less of a geek in my spare time – until I came across the Open Rights Group a couple of years ago and was persuaded to become a supporter when they took on the BBC over a Dalek knitting pattern. So what had I missed in the intervening years? Not much, as it turns out.
For a start, we are still having the copyright debate, except that now the UK has followed in the footsteps of the US DMCA with our own Digital Economy Act. Okay, Creative Commons has expanded its reach, which is great news, but the mainstream content industries continue to stick their collective heads in the sand, sometimes in creative new ways. What’s a girl to do other than try to hit them where it hurts, and point out alternatives to the monumental stupidity that is DRM?
Things aren’t much better on the Open Source side. Writing this article on a possible security backdoor in OpenBSD and the advantages of Open Source security, I might as well have been back in the year 2000. When I mentioned it to a friend who shares some of my interests in the Digital Rights space he said, “But surely that debate has been had and concluded and the good guys won ten years ago?” To some extent that’s true: within certain communities – geeks and techies like my friend and me – that debate is well and truly dead. To the public at large, and more scarily to most of our leaders and policy makers, this is still new ground. What finally convinced me that I had really gotten into my time machine and headed back ten years was this wonderfully sarcastic Computer World article on the recent “cyber espionage” announcement by the Foreign Office. I looked at the name of the author and rather thought that sounded familiar. Eventually it clicked: back when we were still having the Open Source debate, Glyn Moody wrote Rebel Code, a wonderful little book on the history of Linux and the Open Source movement. And here he is, still preaching Open Source, and here I am, still doing the same.
What both the copyright and Open Source space have in common is that law-makers are easily influenced by powerful lobby groups in these areas – the content industry and technology vendors. There is currently one person in the House of Commons who has worked as a scientist (Julian Huppert, MP), and not that many more who have worked in technology. They are under a powerful onslaught of “education” by lobby groups. Those of us who settled these debates ten years ago amongst ourselves need to reach out to our MPs, our ministers, and where possible to key civil servants and try to reverse some of that brain washing they’ve undergone by lobbyists.
What you can do? You can join the Open Rights Group. And next time the UK government declares it doesn’t know how much it spends on IT but by golly, it’ll spend less!, you can write to your MP or the responsible minister and try to educate them. Be polite, be gentle – explain the issues, explain why they should care. One by one, sooner or later, we’ll get them.
[Elsewhere] Mickey Mouse Protection
There is a reason US copyright law is sometimes “affectionately” known as the Mickey Mouse Protection Act; there is a strange coincidence at play here – every time the copyright on Walt Disney’s early creations is about to expire, US copyright terms get magically extended by another few years. Currently, a work is under copyright both in the US and the UK for 70 years after the author’s death. This might make sense for Disney–at least someone is still making money from Walt’s creations–but for the vast majority of creative works out there, this lengthy copyright term is an issue.
Read more at ORGZine.